Wednesday, 10 of March of 2010

Investing

Today’s guest blogger is Treva Harte, from digital publisher Loose Id.

As the cleanup hitter (which would be scary except the previous blog articles have already hit home runs) I want to discuss viewing e-publishing with a career focused eye and add a few things to what Deidre, Angela and Raelene have already discussed.

Electronic publishing is or soon will become part of any professional romance author’s career focus for the following reasons:

–Anything in a professional writer’s contract, including distribution of e-rights, is of interest to the professional signing that contract.

–Traditional print publishing companies are now including e-books as part of their releases and are looking at how electronic publishing models can change their industry.

–Electronic publishing can create new markets for mainstream print and give authors who know that market an “in” when print publishers want authors to deliver that product.

–Romance writers, should they choose to e-publish, can make money and have a writing career.

I emphasized the last point because the benefits of e-publishing which were previously touched on – ability to take on new authors and/or risky stories, less stress, monthly paychecks, backlists, easier submissions process, shorter time to publication, possible print – are absolutely true.  But making money—either short or long term—is a consideration.

All authors invest in whatever publisher they publish a story with.  Their stories are intellectual property and the smart author does his or her best to sell that property to the right market.

All publishers invest in authors, whether the publisher pays an author an advance or a royalty check. An author focused on a career will check on how any publisher will invest in him or her before signing a contract. An accessible, attractive, professional website, an understandable submissions process, books that come out regularly and on schedule, responsible, knowledgeable editors who work closely with authors, providing advertising in many venues, offering carefully constructed legal contracts, and, of course, giving regular royalties are all signs that the company takes pride in its reputation and is going to invest time, effort and money in its authors. Before a manuscript is released the publisher should have paid for cover art, multiple rounds of edits and quite possibly advertising. (Loose Id even has an Author Development Editor to help authors before they formally submit stories to us.) After publication most e-publishers send out books for review and provide other marketing such as scheduled chats on author and reader lists. Wise publishers offer as many avenues to help their authors as they can since they are in partnership with the author to have their books succeed and to have author careers grow.

I have no desire to tell RWA how best to conduct its mission. My own mission is to continue to help run a very profitable business in a way that is best for Loose Id and our authors. It’s unlikely RWA will affect the company’s or the e-publishing industry’s growth if it ignores us, as mentioned in a previous blog.

I might suggest, however, that a thoughtful e-publishing education for those who have a writing career is important to the membership of RWA and will affect them, whether or not RWA takes on that mission.  The e-publishing industry would be happy to assist you and any other organization who chooses to meet that challenge because we want informed, aware authors in our community and the writing community as a whole. It’s part of our investment in authors. I’m sure that RWA wants to invest in having informed, aware authors as well.

- Treva Harte, publisher, Loose Id


Comments RSS TrackBack 12 comments

Kate Douglas

in June 26th, 2009 @ 07:32

Well said, Treva. I don’t understand the “me vs. them” attitude with RWA toward epublishing–we are all authors with the same need for industry information. The line between electronic and print publishers has grown a lot hazier over the years as each picks and chooses the aspects of the other that work for their particular business model. Every single NY print contract I sign has a digital rights section. My ebook contracts have clauses regarding print. If RWA’s goal is to educate romance authors and act as an advocate for their members, they have to focus on the industry as a whole. It’s not the advance that determines a publisher or author’s success–it’s whether or not the books are professionally edited, produced in a format accessible to readers, distributed in a manner that makes them easy to purchase and the author receives payment. While I readily admit that I love getting a nice advance from my NY publisher, that money up front is nothing more than a loan against my earnings. I also love the monthly checks I continue to receive from my epublishers on books that, in some cases, are continuing to sell ten years after their initial release.


Sela Carsen

in June 26th, 2009 @ 07:40

Treva, thank you for blogging here today. I think you’ve absolutely nailed it. Educating authors about e-publishing isn’t just for e-published authors. Everyone who has sold a romance story has a dog in this fight. I look forward to RWA realizing that more education can only ever be a good thing.


Katie Reus

in June 26th, 2009 @ 08:17

Great post, Treva. By providing an education on e-publishing, RWA will only help their members, not harm them.


Adrianna Dane

in June 26th, 2009 @ 08:26

Excellent post, Treva. This exactly highlights why digital rights information and awareness is important to all authors.


Jennifer McKenzie

in June 26th, 2009 @ 09:14

Exactly, Ms. Harte. I love the way you describe the relationship between an eauthor and the publisher. A partnership.
That’s exactly how I think of it. Thank you.


Eva

in June 26th, 2009 @ 10:46

Thank you for reminding us again that print published authors now have to navigate the e-world as well. Maintaining ignorance about the e-publishing market hurts all authors, not just the e-published ones.


Lynne Connolly

in June 26th, 2009 @ 10:55

Well said, Treva.
I’ve been talking to print pubbed authors for years about this. Their agents were using the e-pubbing clauses as giveaways to publishers in contracts and they said their e-sales were low, compared to their print sales.
They still are, but they should be asking for a much higher royalty than most of them get. Otherwise the publishers will be making much higher overheads, overheads that just aren’t fair to the author. Low sales won’t mean that much, then, and when the print publishers promote e-sales more aggressively, the writer will lose out.


Arwen

in June 26th, 2009 @ 12:18

I am heartened to know that RWChange is being heard by the board. Constructive conversation has begun. Education for all members is a necessity. I just spoke to a print author who is just dipping her toe into the e-pub world. She stated she felt out of her safe zone because her normal place for education on her witing career (RWA) did not have the necessary information for her.

What we, RWA, has to do is realize that digital publishing is here to stay. Now the question is…will my organization step up and help me or not?

Ms. Harte made some very good points here about “a thoughtful” education for all. That is what we simply must have.


Mike Feury

in June 26th, 2009 @ 13:42

Well said, Treva :)


Kelly Jamieson

in June 26th, 2009 @ 16:25

I left a comment on Sela’s blog, but this is so relevant – so many are focused on how this is an issue for epublished authors – but digital publishing is impacting EVERY author, even those print published.


KB Alan

in June 27th, 2009 @ 14:21

Thank you, that was very well said.


TrackBack